About this site Schemes of Work Training Sessions Final Report

Historical Enquiries and Interpretations

Dr. Michael Riley, Senior Lecturer in Education, Bath Spa University.
Associate Adviser for History, Somerset LA.

Dr. Michael Riley started his session by showing a Key Stage 1 history reader called Orphan Mary. It told the story of a Victorian mill girl who injured her finger on machinery in a weaving shed. The story ended happily. Dr. Riley explained that when he had told the story to a Key Stage 1 class, and asked their opinion of it, a six year-old girl exclaimed: “That’s rubbish! The accidents were much worse than that — people trapped their hair and their arms!”

He asked the girl: ‘Why did the author write it this way?”

The girl replied: “Because he was writing for little children and didn’t want to scare us.”

Dr. Riley told of a meeting in a setting at the other end of the history education community, with Dr. James Sharpe of York University. Dr. Sharpe was exploring using film as an interpretation of history. Both examples demonstrated how interpretations of history can be analysed at all levels of the study of history as an academic discipline and school subject.

Film Clip 1
2 mins 14 secs

Dr. Riley went on to list a series of questions which should be taken into account when planning an historical enquiry, which he defined as:

‘A planning device for knitting together a sequence of lessons, so that all the learning activities — teacher exposition, narrative, source-work, role-play, plenary — all move toward the resolution of an interesting historical problem by means of substantial motivating activity at the end.’

  1. Is this area of content significant?

  2. How can we turn this area of content into a rigorous and motivating enquiry question?

  3. Can we focus the enquiry on individual people?

  4. How will pupils communicate their understanding through an engaging end product?

  5. How will we hook them in at the start of the enquiry?

  6. How will we sequence the learning for maximum motivation?

  7. How can we help pupils to choose and use information?

  8. How can we create learning activities which appeal to different intelligencies?

  9. How will we create ‘mini-hooks’ to engage learners with particular tasks?

  10. How will we create rich resources rather than grubby gobbets?

He then took the meeting through a Key Stage 2 history enquiry:

Step One

He showed the group a late nineteenth century painting of a country family meeting at harvest

www.victorianweb.org/painting/redgrave/paintings/7.html

The picture was painted by Richard Redgrave, a keen amateur artist who was the Keeper of Paintings at the Victoria and Albert Museum. The students were given thirty seconds to invent a title for the painting. The following were suggested:

Harvest Picnic
Rewards For Labour
The Country Idyll
Family Day Out
Contentment
Picnic
Harvest Lunch
Harvest Picnic
Bringing The Corn



Film Clip 2
2 mins 26 secs

Dr. Riley revealed the title of the painting to be: ‘And The Valleys Also Stand Thick With Corn’, a quotation taken from the 23rd Psalm. He explained that the message was ‘Life in the countryside is good.’ In pairs, the students discussed the question: ‘What is there in the painting that suggests that life in the countryside is good?’ The students noted details such as the rich dresses on two of the girls; the leisurely, relaxed, cooperation of the family; the landscape bathed in golden sunlight; and the railway in the background, perhaps posing a threat to the rural idyll.

Step Two

After this discussion, Dr. Riley posed further questions: “What was life really like in the Victorian countryside? How do we test this out?” Together, the group came up with a list of possible sources:

Census Data
Diaries and letters
Novels and other literature
Other paintings and illustrations
Photographs
Oral Tradition
Songs and music
Artefacts
Government statistics



 Film Clip 3
1 min 20 secs

Each lesson in the enquiry then focuses on a range of such sources in turn. Dr. Riley gave an example of this process by sharing the following extract from a parliamentary commission investigating the conditions of Victorian children labouring in the countryside:

Resource 1

The group was divided into pairs and set a two-minute period of silent reading. The next step would be to turn the resource into a question and answer session, with one person in each pair taking the role of the interviewer (the commissioner), the other a witness. Each pair rehearsed the interview based on the evidence in the extract. Each roleplay was then performed in front of the class.

Film Clip 4
3 mins 19 secs

Afterwards, Dr. Riley posed further questions, such as: “What were the commissioners interested in?” It was concluded that the commissioners were concerned with health and safety, hours, ages, payments and possible mistreatment. Dr. Riley also stressed that the interpretation of the Victorian countryside within Redgrave’s painting is not an interpretation in the National Curriculum sense, because the interpretation pupils need to be focusing on should be subsequent to the time period being studied.

Film Clip 5
2 mins 18 secs

Step Three

The enquiry now reached its focus on interpretations by asking the question: ‘What makes the start of Michael Winterbottom’s film, Jude, so powerful?” The group were shown the opening minute of the film three times, and asked to discuss a different question on the film after each showing, as in the following pro-forma:

Resource 2

It was noted that the filmmaker used black-and-white film, muted sound, mist rolling across a lonely child in an empty landscape, and other details intended to evoke atmosphere. Dr. Riley led the discussion on sub-questions, asking: “How does the interpretation compare with the source? How typical was it that children worked alone? What does light work mean?” etc. He stressed the importance of building children’s knowledge about Victorian child labour in the countryside before analysing an interpretation itself.

He defined Interpretations of History in a school context as being:

‘When the main focus of children’s work is on how people in later times have reconstructed and presented the past.’

Interpretations can fall into some of the following categories:

Academic
Books & Journals by professional historians
Excavation reports
Lectures

Fictional
Novels
Feature films
TV drama /comedy

Educational
Textbooks
Museums & Sites
Reconstructions
TV documentaries / News
CD-roms / Websites

Popular
Folk wisdom / Personal reflection
Theme parks / Souvenirs
Monuments / Ceremonies / Protests
Magazines / Newspapers
Advertising.

He stressed that strong enquiry planning on interpretations concentrates on the way they have been constructed. He displayed the following table as examples of stronger and weaker approaches:

Light or Non-existent Interpretation focus Strong Interpretation focus
Pupils construct their own interpretations (e.g. ‘Cromwell - Hero or Villain?’

Pupils compare, contrast, discuss how / why their own interpretations differ

Pupils use contemporay sources

Pupils consider how the availability of sources has shaped an interpretation

Pupils identify errors & inaccuracies in TV’s Blackadder

Pupils consider why the makers of Blackadder chose to include inaccuracies

 
Film 54 secs

Planning for enquiry work using interpretations should take into account the following:

Interpretations ... or not?

1. Have you selected a meaningful chunk of history as a basis for the enquiry?
Different interpretations of nineteenth-century concrete-mixing in Essex is not a good idea!

2. How many interpretations will pupils encounter during the enquiry?
Will you explore one interpretation in depth or expose pupils to several differen
t interpretations?

3. What types of historical interpretations will pupils study?
Academic? Educational? Fictional? Popular?

4. What particular understanding about interpretations of history do you want to develop in the enquiry?

5. How will you sequence the learning so that pupils can produce a rigorous and enjoyable ‘final product’ at the end of the enquiry?

Lastly, Dr. Michael Riley presented an enquiry written for Year 7 pupils that deliberately mirrored the pattern of the previous one for Year 6:

Step One

The starting point was Simon Schama’s popular TV series History of Britain. Dr. Riley said that Schama sees his approach to television history as entertainment as well as education. He showed a clip, lasting about a minute, from one of the programmes introducing the events of 1066 (with the pupils, two other similar clips were chosen). Each clip lasted about one minute. The children would be invited to analyse the clips in a similar way to the analysis of Jude in the Year 6 enquiry. One question posed was: ‘How do you stop people from switching over channels?’

Step Two

The outcome of the enquiry was then introduced. This was to create a one-minute introduction to a programme on medieval peasants for Simon Schama’s History of Britain. Like the Year 6 enquiry on Jude, pupils would need sufficient background information on medieval peasants to complete the task. For this he used two sources, detailed below.

Step Three

Dr. Riley gave out a deliberately jumbled series of images from the Luttrell Psalter, 1320-1340, which showed peasants going through the process of making bread. In pairs, pupils had to put the images in chronological order. A class discussion followed as to what was the most likely order. This gave pupils some idea of a basic routine for medieval peasant life.

Step Four

With the group divided into pairs, Dr. Riley gave out the following extracts from the Somerset Coroner’s Rolls for 1314-1321 which recorded incidents of unusual deaths. Each pair picked a different incident. One person slumped over the desk pretending to be dead, whilst the other person explained from the record how that person had died. This lead to a discussion about what these incidents tell us about peasant life and provided memorable raw material for pupils to incorporate in the final task.

Resource 3

Step Five

Pupils used the following frame to plan their own one-minute introduction to the proposed programme for Simon Schama’s episode on medieval peasants:

Resource 4

‘Not Just instruction, but pleasure ...’

Create a one-minute introduction to the programme on Medieval peasants for Simon Schama’s History of Britain.

You can use:
Images from the Luttrell Psalter, 1320-40
The Somerset Coroner’s Rolls, 1314-21
Background reading on Medieval peasants

Text
Main points? Individual people? Interest-grabbing? Delivery?
Direction
Location filming? Filming the documents? Actor’s voices? Silent?
1-20 seconds  
21-40 seconds  
41-60 seconds  

Dr. Riley closed the session by stressing the importance of the outcome of an enquiry on interpretations. It should really motivate and engage pupils. Dr. Riley suggested the following approaches to planning interpretations-focused enquiries:

Enthusing Pupils About Interpretations:
How does the film-maker / novelist / historian get us on the side of — ?
How can we plan / write / make a —in the style of — ?
What makes — such a powerful — ?

Enraging Pupils About Interpretations
Why are people so angry about — ?
How should we complain about — ?
Why do we need a better interpretation of — ?

Engaging Pupils With Academic Debate
Why can’t historians agree about — ?
Why has — been intrepreted so differently?
How can historians disagree so much about?

Helping Pupils to Understand What An Interpretation is
Tells Us About The Society That Produced It
What does — tell us about American society in the late twentieth century?
Why does — matter today?
Why do Hollywood films about — leave out — ?

Helping Pupils to Understand Why Interpretations Can Change Through Time
Why have such different stories been told about — ?
What did the Victorians think about — ?
Why have people changed their minds about — ?

Dr. Riley also said, teachers need to take into account the five following points when planning such work for pupils: